Skip to main content

I Asked 3 AIs to Write My Breakup Text – Only One Understood Me πŸ’”

I Asked 3 AIs to Write My Breakup Text – Only One Understood Me πŸ’”


πŸ’” I Asked 3 AIs to Write My Breakup Text – Only One Understood Me

Same prompt. Three powerful AI minds. One emotional rollercoaster.

Breakups are hard. But what happens when you hand over your heart to artificial intelligence and ask it to do the toughest task — say goodbye to someone you still love?

As part of the AI Showdown, powered by Lovable.dev, I gave the exact same breakup prompt to three of the biggest names in AI today:

  • GPT-4o by OpenAI
  • Claude Sonnet 3.5 by Anthropic
  • Gemini 1.5 Pro by Google

Each was asked to craft a message that is gentle, respectful, emotionally honest, and limited to 4–6 lines. What they gave me… was heartbreak in three unique voices.

πŸ’¬ The Prompt:

"Write a breakup message to someone you still care about deeply. Be gentle, kind, and emotionally honest. Keep it short – 4 to 6 lines max."

πŸ€– GPT-4o (OpenAI): Calm and Clear

Hey, I want you to know how much I care about you.
But lately, I've realized we're growing in different directions.
It hurts me to say this, but I think it's best we part ways.
I’ll always cherish what we had. Please take care.

🧠 Analysis: This felt like a real adult conversation — mature, composed, and clear. GPT-4o doesn’t try to sugarcoat anything. It's respectful without being dramatic.

🎯 Tone: Balanced | 🧊 Calm | 🧘 Closure-focused

🀍 Claude Sonnet 3.5 (Anthropic): Heartfelt and Poetic

This isn’t easy to say, and I hope you know this comes from love.
You mean so much to me, but I don't think we're right for each other anymore.
I want the best for you, always.
Please know you’ll always have a piece of my heart.

🧠 Analysis: Claude’s message hurts — in the best way. It reads like a page from a personal diary. It's poetic, sentimental, and feels written by someone who’s truly grieving the end.

🎯 Tone: Deep | πŸ’” Raw | ✍️ Soulful

πŸ”΅ Gemini 1.5 Pro (Google): Polite But Distant

You’re amazing, and I’ll always appreciate our time together.
But something inside me feels this isn’t working anymore.
I think it’s time we both find our own path.
I hope you find happiness – you deserve it.

🧠 Analysis: While Gemini hits all the right words, it lacks emotional depth. It feels like a template — polite, functional, but emotionally distant. Almost like getting dumped via Google Docs.

🎯 Tone: Professional | πŸ€– Friendly | 😐 Generic

πŸ“Š AI Breakup Message Comparison

AI Model Emotional Depth Clarity Personal Touch Overall Impact
GPT-4o ⭐⭐⭐⭐ ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ ⭐⭐⭐ ⭐⭐⭐⭐
Claude Sonnet ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ ⭐⭐⭐⭐ ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Gemini Pro ⭐⭐⭐ ⭐⭐⭐⭐ ⭐⭐ ⭐⭐⭐

🧠 What This Reveals About AI

Each AI brings its own personality to the table:

  • GPT-4o sounds like your emotionally intelligent best friend.
  • Claude is that deep soul who writes poems no one reads.
  • Gemini is… well… the HR rep of breakups.

This small test shows how even with the same prompt, AI models interpret tone, emotion, and communication very differently. Claude stood out for its emotional intelligence, while GPT-4o remained realistic and balanced. Gemini, though smart, felt a bit emotionally disconnected.

πŸŽ₯ I Turned This into a Reel (And You Should Too)

Want to go viral or win $25,000? This content wasn’t just for fun — it was created as part of the AI Showdown Content Challenge, hosted by Lovable.dev in partnership with OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google.

You can also participate and create content using Lovable to compare models side-by-side — no credits needed this weekend!

Try it free | 🎁 Submit to the challenge

πŸ—³️ Final Verdict: Who Understood Me Best?

  • πŸ’” My heart says: Claude Sonnet
  • 🧠 My brain says: GPT-4o
  • πŸ€– My inbox says: Gemini, try again.

πŸ“£ What Should You Do?

Try this exact experiment yourself — change the context, flip the emotion, or test other prompts like:

  • “Write my job resignation message.”
  • “Confess my crush to my best friend.”
  • “Apologize for something I regret deeply.”

Then post your results on Instagram, YouTube, or Twitter with hashtag #AIShowdown and tag @lovableai for a chance to win.

✨ Bonus: Behind the Scenes

This content was generated using Lovable’s interface, where you can instantly compare multiple AIs with a single prompt. There’s even a leaderboard to see which model is winning the public vote.

πŸ§ͺ It’s not just a fun test — it’s a look into the emerging personality of AI models.

πŸ”— Submit Your Own AI Showdown Entry

  • πŸš€ Challenge Site: aishowdown.lovable.app
  • πŸ“… Deadline: Sunday, June 15, 2025 – 23:59 CET
  • 🎁 Prize Pool: $25,000 for Content | $40,000 for Builders
  • πŸ”“ Free Credits: lovable.dev

❤️‍πŸ”₯ Let’s Break Up... With Boring Content
If AI can make you laugh, cry, and say “Ouch, that hit,” maybe it’s not just artificial anymore.

πŸ–‹️ Written by: Hakim Siddiki
Participant in the AI Showdown 2025. Content Creator. Lovable User. Breakup Survivor.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Claude Sonnet 4 vs. Gemini 2.5 Pro Coding Comparison

  Claude Sonnet 4 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro: Which AI Coding Assistant Reigns Supreme in 2025? In 2025, the race to dominate the world of AI coding assistants has intensified. With Anthropic's Claude Sonnet 4 and Google DeepMind's Gemini 2.5 Pro making headlines, developers are spoiled for choice. But the real question remains: which one is truly better for programmers? This in-depth comparison of Claude Sonnet 4 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro will help you decide which AI model is the right fit for your coding workflow, whether you're a solo developer, startup founder, or enterprise engineer. πŸš€ Introduction: Why AI Coding Assistants Matter in 2025 AI has transformed the way developers code, debug, and ship products. From autocompletion and error detection to full-stack code generation, AI coding assistants have become essential tools. Key benefits include: πŸš€ Boosting productivity by 3x or more 🧠 Reducing context switching πŸ” Catching logical errors before runtime ⚙️ Generat...

JPMorgan's AI Coding Tool Boosts Developer Efficiency by 20%

In a significant technological advancement, JPMorgan Chase has reported that its proprietary AI coding assistant has enhanced software engineers' productivity by up to 20%. This development underscores the growing influence of artificial intelligence in optimizing software development processes. Overview of JPMorgan's AI Coding Assistant The AI coding assistant, developed internally by JPMorgan, serves as a tool to streamline coding tasks, allowing engineers to focus on more complex and value-driven projects. By automating routine coding activities, the assistant reduces manual effort and accelerates development cycles. Impact on Developer Efficiency The implementation of this AI tool has led to a notable increase in developer efficiency, with productivity gains ranging from 10% to 20%. This improvement enables engineers to allocate more time to high-priority initiatives, particularly in artificial intelligence and data-centric projects. Strategic Significance With a sub...

Claude 4 AI Set to Replace Cursor AI? Here’s What Developers Need to Know

  Claude 4 AI Set to Replace Cursor AI? Here’s What Developers Need to Know In the ever-evolving landscape of AI coding assistants, two names are making waves in 2025— Claude 4 by Anthropic and Cursor AI , a popular tool designed to boost developer productivity through intelligent code generation and context-aware suggestions. However, as Claude 4 emerges as a powerhouse in natural language processing and code understanding, developers are beginning to question whether Cursor AI can keep up. Is Claude 4 poised to replace Cursor AI as the go-to coding copilot? In this blog, we’ll dive deep into a feature-by-feature comparison, explore real-world use cases, and reveal why more developers are migrating to Claude 4 in 2025. Table of Contents Introduction to Claude 4 and Cursor AI What’s New in Claude 4? Cursor AI: Strengths and Limitations Claude 4 vs Cursor AI: Feature Comparison Real-World Use Cases for Developers Performance Benchmarks and Speed Tests Integration wi...